The Hoka Clifton 9 (top) and Hoka Clifton (8) bottom side-by-side. The Hoka Clifton 9 has a fit that is longer, even though we tested the same size of shoe. One issue I noticed testing the regular women’s shoe was that the fit is now longer .
OUR VERDICT. The Bondi 7 is supposed to be a max-cushioned, long-distance trainer but it rides more like a daily trainer. Its stiff Meta-Rocker midsole helps roll you through transitions and makes the ride feel efficient, however the Bondi 7 is missing the signature Hoka “running on clouds” experience. Version 7 has been updated with a new
Uses DNA Loft and BioMoGo DNA cushioning technologies. Employs GuideRails Technology. Wider and have a wider toe-box. Ranges between $100 to $160. Hoka One One Running Shoes. It lasts longer than Brooks running shoes. Uses EVA Foam technology. Uses Meta-Rocker technology. True to size fitting.
On Running Shoes range from around £120 to £170, depending on the style, whereas Hoka One One shoes range from £110 to £160. There isn’t much in the price, and both are pretty durable. Granted, On shoes used to fray at the laces and wear in the hot spots, but they’ve made a lot of adaptations, which have really made them worth their money.
Clifton 8s have a 5mm drop. Bondi 8s have a 4mm drop. Both are good for forefoot and midfoot strikers. If you’re paying attention, you’ll have noticed that the drop is comparable between these shoes – 5mm for the Clifton and 4mm for the Bondi. We can’t say we’d notice a millimeter of difference between the two, and both are considered
Even though the Bondi is one of the original HOKA models, the Clifton has arguably become more popular over previous years. With the Clifton being lighter and less expensive than the Bondi, that maybe explains the reason. This HOKA Bondi 8 vs HOKA Clifton 9 review article breaks down the key differences between the latest models. . 184 249 179 292 10 259 257 157 394

difference between hoka and hoka one one